From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932319AbWDRUSi (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:18:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932323AbWDRUSi (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:18:38 -0400 Received: from mail.linicks.net ([217.204.244.146]:10985 "EHLO linux233.linicks.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932319AbWDRUSh (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:18:37 -0400 From: Nick Warne To: Greg KH Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.7 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:18:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: "Alexander E. Patrakov" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060418042300.GA11061@kroah.com> <7c3341450604181152w654a1084s8924e19224f6053@mail.gmail.com> <20060418190638.GA2992@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20060418190638.GA2992@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604182118.01490.nick@linicks.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 18 April 2006 20:06, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:52:19PM +0100, Nick Warne wrote: > > > No one has submitted it to the stable@kernel.org mail address from what > > > I can see, so no, it is not in the queue. If you think otherwise, > > > please send it. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > I thought the 2.6.xx.n series was the 'stable' (as per kernel.org)? > > Yes it is. Did I say otherwise in those sentences? Argh, I see... Alexander said: > Greg KH wrote: >> -EXTRAVERSION = .6 >> +EXTRAVERSION = .7 > Hello, I would like to know if there is a plan to include this in the next > -stable update? I misread the ref. to the different link/patch referred too... Sorry for the noise. Nick -- "Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it." -Chinese Proverb