From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, arjan@infradead.org,
greg@kroah.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Makefile: export-symbol usage report generator.
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:41:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060419234112.GI25047@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1145489158.7323.169.camel@localhost>
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 04:25:58PM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 16:09 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:38:26AM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> >
> > > I ran a report to extract export-symbol usage by kernel modules. The results
> > > are at http://www.sudhaa.com/~ram/misc/export_report.txt
> > >
> > > The report lists:
> > > 1. All the exported symbols and their usage counts by in-kernel modules.
> > > 2. for each in-kernel module, lists the modules and the exported symbols
> > > from those modules, that it depends on.
> > >
> > > Highlights:
> > > On x86 architecture
> > > (1) 880 exported symbols not used by any in-kernel modules.
> > > (2) 1792 exported symbols used only once.
> > >
> > > I hope this report/tool shall help all inkernel modules to revisit their usage
> > > of kernel interfaces.
> > >
> > > This patch integrates the report-generator into the kernel build process. After
> > > applying this patch, invoke 'make export_report' and it creates the report in
> > > Documentation/export_report.txt
> > >...
> >
> > I like your patch, but I have observed two issues:
> > - please don't force an allmodconfig, simply use the currently compiled
> > kernel
>
> Looking for ideas. Its hard to extract out the imported symbols unless
> they are compiled as modules. Running the report on a currently compiled
> kernel will miss most of the subsystems that are not compile as modules.
> Hence the report wont be complete. Any suggestions?
>...
- it's a tool for kernel hackers who know what they are doing
- it's a tool to help you finding unused exports, but each one still
requires manual verification
Besides this, e.g. CONFIG_SMP=n brings you more modules and therefore a
better coverage than allmodconfig.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-19 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-13 12:38 [RFC PATCH 1/2] Makefile: export-symbol usage report generator Ram Pai
2006-04-18 14:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-19 23:25 ` Ram Pai
2006-04-19 23:41 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-04-20 0:53 ` Ram Pai
2006-04-20 1:06 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060419234112.GI25047@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox