From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751137AbWDTGjO (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:39:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751154AbWDTGjO (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:39:14 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56301 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751137AbWDTGjN (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:39:13 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: discuss@x86-64.org, lkml@lpbproductions.com Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] [1/2] i386/x86-64: Fix x87 information leak between processes Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:39:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbeulich@novell.com, richard.brunner@amd.com References: <4446D79D.mailOX9112Y1O@suse.de> <200604192328.39429.lkml@lpbproductions.com> In-Reply-To: <200604192328.39429.lkml@lpbproductions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604200839.00606.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 20 April 2006 08:28, Matt Heler wrote: > Patch says 1/2 . Is there another patch that comes with this ? Or is vger > lagging again ? The other patch was a unrelated x86-64 only patch which I normally not cc to linux-kernel, but only to discuss@x86-64.org. You can check it out in the archives. -Andi