From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750943AbWDTN0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:26:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750942AbWDTN0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:26:47 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52922 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750941AbWDTN0q (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:26:46 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] [6/6] i386: Move CONFIG_DOUBLEFAULT into arch/i386 where it belongs. Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:26:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Adrian Bunk , "Randy.Dunlap" , torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4444C0EA.mailKK411J5GA@suse.de> <20060418190839.3fa53a0f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20060420114946.GM25047@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20060420114946.GM25047@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604201526.22318.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 20 April 2006 13:49, Adrian Bunk wrote: > My main problem with his patch is still the way he did it - sending a > patch reverting a recently included patch with neither discussion before > the patch nor mentioning in the patch that it's a revert nor a Cc to the > people involved with the patch. I just noticed a problem (bogus symbols in my x86-64 config) and fixed it. I normally don't look at which patch it introduced for such trivial changes. -Andi