From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932140AbWDTXul (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:50:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932141AbWDTXul (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:50:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:57529 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932140AbWDTXuk (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:50:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:49:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Siddha, Suresh B" Cc: pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, efault@gmx.de, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, mingo@elte.hu, kernel@kolivas.org, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] smpnice: don't consider sched groups which are lightly loaded for balancing Message-Id: <20060420164936.5988460d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060420095408.A10267@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20060328185202.A1135@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <442A0235.1060305@bigpond.net.au> <20060329145242.A11376@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <442B1AE8.5030005@bigpond.net.au> <20060329165052.C11376@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <442B3111.5030808@bigpond.net.au> <20060401204824.A8662@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <442F7871.4030405@bigpond.net.au> <20060419182444.A5081@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <444719F8.2050602@bigpond.net.au> <20060420095408.A10267@unix-os.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Siddha, Suresh B" wrote: > > updated patch appended. thanks. Where are we up to with smpnice now? Are there still any known regressions/problems/bugs/etc? Has sufficient testing been done for us to know this? Thanks.