From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751315AbWDUMCi (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:02:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751316AbWDUMCi (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:02:38 -0400 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org ([213.95.27.120]:59806 "EHLO ganesha.gnumonks.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751315AbWDUMCh (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:02:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:15:30 -0300 From: Harald Welte To: Maurice Volaski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Subject: Re: iptables is complaining with bogus unknown error 18446744073709551615 Message-ID: <20060421111530.GE5286@rama> Mail-Followup-To: Harald Welte , Maurice Volaski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: mutt-ng devel-20050619 (Debian) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Maurice. Didn't you report this bug already to bugzilla.netfilter.org (and maybe eben to the bugme.osdl.org)? Reporting a bug in three distinct places, even though it has been replied to at one place is not really going to use developer resources efficiently, don't you think? On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 02:21:17AM -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote: > At least since 2.6.1.16.1, many calls to iptables no longer function at l= east under 64-bit x86,=20 > presumably due to a bug in the netfilter kernel code. It probably was since 2.6.16 then, that was when the x_tables patches were merged, the code most likely to have affected any such incompatibility of the binary interface. It was tested thoroughlt, especially on x86_64, whihc is my main development platform. However, your problem seems to be something different. I suspect that all rules with '-p tcp' or '-p udp' don't work, whereas others do. You seem to be missing the xt_tcpudp.ko module, which implements that feature in 2.6.17-rcX kernels.=20 Please refer to https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D467 --=20 - Harald Welte http://netfilter.org/ =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFESL7SXaXGVTD0i/8RAiCRAJ9j+B18/ejuvsnRkQM/4rP4gesOJACggyWp 2IkQcQ2gFwZv87stcXjS04Y= =aPbT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf--