From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932402AbWDUQOW@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932402AbWDUQOW (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:14:22 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932400AbWDUQOV
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:14:21 -0400
Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:30104 "EHLO perch.kroah.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932402AbWDUQOT (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:14:19 -0400
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:05:29 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
       Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>, T?r?k Edwin <edwin@gurde.com>,
       linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
Message-ID: <20060421150529.GA15811@kroah.com>
References: <20060417162345.GA9609@infradead.org> <1145293404.8542.190.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20060417173319.GA11506@infradead.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604171454070.17563@d.namei> <20060417195146.GA8875@kroah.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604191010300.12755@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> <1145462454.3085.62.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604192102001.7177@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> <20060419201154.GB20545@kroah.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604211528140.22097@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604211528140.22097@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 03:30:26PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >> >> Well then, have a look at http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/
> >> >
> >> >hmm on first sight that seems to be basically an extension to the
> >> >existing capability() code... rather than a 'real' LSM module. Am I
> >> >missing something here?
> >> 
> >> (So what's the definition for a "real" LSM module?)
> >
> >No idea, try submitting the patch :)
> >
> Because it's too big, you only get URLs:
> 
> [01/02] http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/mtadm_hooks-2.6.17-rc2.diff  137KB
> [02/02] http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/mtadm_module-2.6.17-rc2.diff  27KB
> 
> Don't mention CodingStyle, I know. This is just a post to respond to the
> topic on why noone submitted it earlier.
> I already see it coming...

I don't understand.  Do you really want to get this module into the
kernel?  Or are you just posting it here for the link when people
stumble across it in the archives?

thanks,

greg k-h