The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com, manfred@colorfullife.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:09:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060424160943.4bbdb788.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060424111141.GC16007@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>

Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> @@ -485,6 +485,14 @@ int rcu_pending(int cpu)
>  		__rcu_pending(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk, &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu));
>  }
>  
> +int rcu_soon_pending(int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu);
> +	struct rcu_data *rdp_bh = &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu);
> +
> +	return (!!rdp->curlist || !!rdp_bh->curlist);
> +}

This patch sets my nerves a-jangling.

What are the units of soonness?  It's awfully waffly.  Can we specify this
more tightly?

Neither rcu_pending() nor rcu_soon_pending() are commented or documented. 
Pity the poor user trying to work out what they do, and how they differ. 
They're global symbols and they form part of the RCU API - they should be
kernel docified, please.

There's probably a reason why neither of these symbols are exported to
modules.  Once they're actually documented I mught be able to work out what
that reason is ;)


  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-24 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-24 11:11 [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface Heiko Carstens
2006-04-24 23:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-04-25  5:27   ` Heiko Carstens
2006-04-25 11:46     ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-04-25 11:52       ` Heiko Carstens
2006-04-25 12:08         ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-04-25 12:27           ` [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_needs_cpu() interface Heiko Carstens
     [not found]             ` <20060426141205.58675763.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-04-27  8:11               ` [patch] RCU: add comments to rcu_pending/rcu_needs_cpu Heiko Carstens
2006-05-01 21:57                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-05-02  6:35                   ` Heiko Carstens
2006-04-25 12:28           ` [patch] s390: exploit rcu_needs_cpu() interface Heiko Carstens
2006-04-25 11:23   ` [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface Paul E. McKenney
2006-04-25 11:33     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-04-25 11:48       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060424160943.4bbdb788.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox