From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751158AbWDXTaa (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:30:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751163AbWDXTaa (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:30:30 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:40328 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751158AbWDXTa3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:30:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:30:28 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Gary Poppitz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Compiling C++ modules Message-ID: <20060424193028.GC27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 01:16:26PM -0600, Gary Poppitz wrote: > I have the task of porting an existing file system to Linux. This > code is in C++ and I have noticed that the Linux kernel has > made use of C++ keywords and other things that make it incompatible. > > I would be most willing to point out the areas that need adjustment > and supply patch files to be reviewed. > > What would be the best procedure to accomplish this? cat same_old_stuff >/dev/null and save the bandwidth...