From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:23:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604251723.01448.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604241354200.3701@g5.osdl.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 810 bytes --]
On Monday 24 April 2006 23:07, you wrote:
> A long time ago, I had a machine with a 3c509 card that would sometimes
Heh, I still have this one in my server. :)
> The fake interrupt could even print out a warning if somebody returns
> SA_HANDLED (since normally there _shouldn't_ have been any work to handle
> for it),
Are you sure this can't race against the hardware?
Something like this:
Kernel Hardware
- generate fake IRQ
- enter the low level IRQ handling
- hardware generates an IRQ and
sets it's IRQ reason registers
to "I have smthng to do"
- enter the handler and service
the IRQ
- return SA_HANDLED
--
Greetings Michael.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-25 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-24 18:41 better leve triggered IRQ management needed Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-24 18:59 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-04-24 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 19:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-24 20:16 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-24 20:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-24 21:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 21:20 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-24 22:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 21:22 ` [RFC 1/2] irq: record edge-level setting Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-24 21:49 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-24 21:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-24 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 22:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
[not found] ` <20060424141926.3872f921@localhost.localdomain>
2006-04-24 21:22 ` [RFC 2/2] warn on shared edge-triggered irq Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-25 15:23 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2006-04-24 19:15 ` better leve triggered IRQ management needed Russell King
2006-04-24 20:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 19:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-24 19:35 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-04-24 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-24 20:50 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-04-24 21:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-29 21:25 ` Alan Cox
2006-04-29 21:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-30 4:48 ` Neil Brown
2006-04-30 5:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-30 6:13 ` Neil Brown
2006-04-30 6:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-02 5:10 ` Neil Brown
2006-05-02 15:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-30 7:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200604251723.01448.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox