From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932299AbWDYUh3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:37:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932300AbWDYUh3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:37:29 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:5310 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932299AbWDYUh3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:37:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:37:24 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: dtor_core@ameritech.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Telling the kernel that keys need soft release? Message-ID: <20060425203724.GA29246@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20060425202526.GA29169@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vavatch.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:33:57PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Yes, with a proper DMI entry to activate it would be very welcome. I was thinking more along the lines of extending the setkeycodes support to allow a flag to specify it from userspace, though I guess adding some kernel defaults wouldn't hurt. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org