From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932380AbWDZFWl (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:22:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932379AbWDZFWl (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:22:41 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:12982 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932374AbWDZFWk (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:22:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:17:33 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Akinobu Mita Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] use kref for blk_queue_tag Message-ID: <20060426051733.GA332@kroah.com> References: <20060426021059.235216000@localhost.localdomain> <20060426021121.260553000@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060426021121.260553000@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:11:00AM +0800, Akinobu Mita wrote: > Use kref for reference counter of blk_queue_tag. Why? Doesn't this, and your other patches here affect performance? thanks, greg k-h