From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751680AbWD0VM3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:12:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751681AbWD0VM3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:12:29 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51391 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751679AbWD0VM2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:12:28 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Martin Bligh Subject: Re: checklist (Re: 2.6.17-rc2-mm1) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:11:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Andrew Morton , "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060427014141.06b88072.akpm@osdl.org> <200604272156.11606.ak@suse.de> <445130E7.3060402@google.com> In-Reply-To: <445130E7.3060402@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604272211.41923.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 27 April 2006 23:00, Martin Bligh wrote: > > Some Unixes have a cstyle(1). Maybe there is a free variant of it > > somewhere. But such a tool might put a lot of people on l-k out of job @) > > heh. we could do some basic stuff at least. run through lindent, and see > if it changes ;-) Good luck weeding out the false positives from that. > Can't tell whether that was meant to be positive or negative feedback. > All this would require is "email patch to test-thingy@test.kernel.org". I meant it would be better if it happened automatically when the patch is submitted through the normal channels. -Andi