From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964876AbWD1Fti (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:49:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965195AbWD1Fti (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:49:38 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:8653 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964876AbWD1Fth (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:49:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:48:59 +0900 From: MAEDA Naoaki To: Mike Galbraith Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller Message-Id: <20060428144859.a07bb5b2.maeda.naoaki@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <1146201936.7523.15.camel@homer> References: <20060428013730.9582.9351.sendpatchset@moscone.dvs.cs.fujitsu.co.jp> <1146201936.7523.15.camel@homer> Organization: FUJITSU LIMITED X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mike, On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:25:35 +0200 Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 10:37 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > This patchset adds a CPU resource controller on top of Resource Groups. > > The CPU resource controller manages CPU resources by scaling timeslice > > allocated for each task without changing the algorithm of the O(1) > > scheduler. > > > > Please consider these for inclusion in -mm tree. > > This patch set professes to be a resource controller, yet 100% of high > priority tasks are uncontrolled. Distribution of CPU among high > priority tasks isn't important, but distribution of what they leave > behind is? Do you mean niced tasks are uncontrolled by the controller? TASK_INTERACTIVEs are left untouched intentionally, but niced tasks are also controlled. Thanks, MAEDA Naoaki