From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932228AbWEAUaZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 16:30:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932230AbWEAUaZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 16:30:25 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:44043 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932228AbWEAUaY (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 16:30:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:25:03 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Jens Axboe Cc: Hua Zhong , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] likely cleanup: revert unlikely in ll_back_merge_fn Message-ID: <20060430192503.GE4452@ucw.cz> References: <20060425183026.GR4102@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060425183026.GR4102@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 25-04-06 20:30:26, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25 2006, Hua Zhong wrote: > > With likely/unlikely profiling (see the recent patch dwalker@mvista.com > > sent), on my not-so-busy-typical-development system it shows more than > > 80K misses and no hits. So I guess it makes sense to revert. > > > > I don't know BIO code very well, but I hope this data is useful for the > > experts. > > Well you'd want to optimize for the busy case, right, no point in > optimizing for a more idle system. Careful here... for battery-powered systems you may want to optimize for idle system... Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp!