From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750918AbWEDHtX (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 03:49:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751430AbWEDHtX (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 03:49:23 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:3974 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750918AbWEDHtW (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 03:49:22 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Greg KH Subject: Re: USB 2.0 ehci failure with large amount of RAM (4GB) on x86_64 Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 09:49:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Nathan Becker , David Brownell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <2151339d0605032148n5d6936ay31ab017fbabc65b3@mail.gmail.com> <2151339d0605032152g64ec77bfhe90dc08180463c31@mail.gmail.com> <20060504052751.GA23054@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20060504052751.GA23054@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605040949.11010.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 04 May 2006 07:27, Greg KH wrote: > Andi, you remember what fixed this the last time? IIRC there wasn't a fix - just a conclusion that in one case it was likely a bad interaction with SMM code. In the other case we didn't get that far. -Andi