From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
jlan@engr.sgi.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH][delayacct] Fix the timespec_sub() interface (was Re: [Patch 1/8] Setup)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:28:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060510105856.GH29432@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060510102716.GG29432@in.ibm.com>
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:57:16PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:24:49AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please find the updated patch, which changes the interface of timespec_sub()
> > > as suggested in the review comments
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * sub = end - start, in normalized form
> > > + * sub = lhs - rhs, in normalized form
> > > */
> > > -static inline void timespec_sub(struct timespec *start, struct timespec *end,
> > > - struct timespec *sub)
> > > +static inline struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec *lhs,
> > > + struct timespec *rhs)
> > > {
> >
> > I'd have thought that it would be more consistent and a saner interface to
> > use pass-by-value:
> >
> > static inline struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec lhs,
> > struct timespec rhs)
> >
> > It should generate the same code.
> >
> > I mentioned this last time - did you choose to not do this for some reason,
> > or did it just slip past?
>
> Sorry, that definitely slip past.
>
> I'll send another update
>
Hi, Andrew,
Here is another attempt to do fix the interface.
Thanks for the review,
Balbir Singh,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs
Changelog
1. Change the interface of timespec_sub() to return by value and rename
the arguments. Use lhs,rhs instead of end,start.
2. Pass the arguments by value
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/time.h | 12 +++++++-----
kernel/delayacct.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/time.h~timespec-sub-return-by-value include/linux/time.h
--- linux-2.6.17-rc3/include/linux/time.h~timespec-sub-return-by-value 2006-05-10 15:58:19.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc3-balbir/include/linux/time.h 2006-05-10 15:59:48.000000000 +0530
@@ -68,13 +68,15 @@ extern unsigned long mktime(const unsign
extern void set_normalized_timespec(struct timespec *ts, time_t sec, long nsec);
/*
- * sub = end - start, in normalized form
+ * sub = lhs - rhs, in normalized form
*/
-static inline void timespec_sub(struct timespec *start, struct timespec *end,
- struct timespec *sub)
+static inline struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec lhs,
+ struct timespec rhs)
{
- set_normalized_timespec(sub, end->tv_sec - start->tv_sec,
- end->tv_nsec - start->tv_nsec);
+ struct timespec ts_delta;
+ set_normalized_timespec(&ts_delta, lhs.tv_sec - rhs.tv_sec,
+ lhs.tv_nsec - rhs.tv_nsec);
+ return ts_delta;
}
/*
diff -puN kernel/delayacct.c~timespec-sub-return-by-value kernel/delayacct.c
--- linux-2.6.17-rc3/kernel/delayacct.c~timespec-sub-return-by-value 2006-05-10 15:58:19.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc3-balbir/kernel/delayacct.c 2006-05-10 16:00:30.000000000 +0530
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline void delayacct_end(struct
s64 ns;
do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(end);
- timespec_sub(&ts, start, end);
+ ts = timespec_sub(*end, *start);
ns = timespec_to_ns(&ts);
if (ns < 0)
return;
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-10 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-02 6:12 [Patch 1/8] Setup Balbir Singh
2006-05-08 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-09 3:48 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-10 10:16 ` [PATCH][delayacct] Fix the timespec_sub() interface (was Re: [Patch 1/8] Setup) Balbir Singh
2006-05-10 10:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-10 10:27 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-10 10:58 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2006-05-08 21:23 ` [Patch 1/8] Setup Andrew Morton
2006-05-09 3:56 ` Balbir Singh
2006-05-10 10:18 ` [PATCH][delayacct] un-inline delayacct_end(), remove initialization of ts (was Re: [Patch 1/8] Setup) Balbir Singh
2006-05-09 11:46 ` [Patch 1/8] Setup Thomas Gleixner
2006-05-09 13:20 ` [Lse-tech] " Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060510105856.GH29432@in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jlan@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox