Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix

David S. Miller
2006-05-10T22:31:46Z

From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:10:24 +0100

> But that's the argument in favour of using diff, not shutting the
> bogus warnings up...

IMHO, the tree should build with -Werror without exception.
Once you have that basis, new ones will not show up easily
and the hard part of the battle has been won.

Yes, people will post a lot of bogus versions of warning fixes, but
we're already good at flaming those off already :-)