From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sfrench@us.ibm.com,
stable@kernel.org, urban@teststation.com
Subject: Re: + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:27:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060511112718.454094dd.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490605111112h8fde257s3de1128ed95577b5@mail.gmail.com>
"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/11/06, akpm@osdl.org <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> >
> > The patch titled
> >
> > deprecate smbfs in favour of cifs
> >
> > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> >
> > deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch
> >
> > See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
> > out what to do about this
> >
> >
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
> >
> > smbfs is a bit buggy and has no maintainer. Change it to shout at the user on
> > the first five mount attempts - tell them to switch to CIFS.
> >
> > Come November we'll mark it BROKEN and see what happens.
> >
> [snip]
>
> Perhaps an addition to Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt is
> also in order?
That seems a bit duplicative, so I didn't bother.
> Something noting that it will be marked as broken in November and go
> away some 12 - 18 months after that perhaps?
We'll see. We'd like to remove it as early as poss, of course. But right
now, I don't know when that'll be.
The personal challenge is to remove it before Greg gets his devfs-removal
patches in ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-11 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200605110717.k4B7HuVW006999@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-05-11 17:51 ` + deprecate-smbfs-in-favour-of-cifs.patch added to -mm tree Dave Jones
2006-05-12 15:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-05-12 16:19 ` John Kelly
2006-05-12 16:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12 16:31 ` John Kelly
2006-05-12 16:40 ` Tom Rini
2006-05-12 16:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12 16:52 ` John Kelly
2006-05-12 16:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 17:10 ` John Kelly
2006-05-12 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 18:13 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-05-14 3:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-14 4:37 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-12 17:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-05-12 19:50 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-05-12 16:36 ` grundig
2006-05-15 10:01 ` Helge Hafting
2006-05-11 18:12 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-11 18:27 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-05-11 18:57 ` John Kelly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060511112718.454094dd.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=urban@teststation.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox