public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mark Hounschell <markh@compro.net>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:56:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060512115614.GA28377@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4464740C.8060305@compro.net>


* Mark Hounschell <markh@compro.net> wrote:

> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 12 May 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> >> ah. This actually uncovered a real bug. We were calling __do_softirq()
> >> with interrupts enabled (and being preemptible) - which is certainly
> >> bad.
> > 
> > Hmm, I wonder if this is also affecting Mark's problem.
> 
> I thought the same thing when I read it??

could you try the patch below?

	Ingo

----

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> > one solution would be to forbid disable_irq() from softirq contexts, and
> > to convert the vortex timeout function to a workqueue and use the
> > *_delayed_work() APIs to drive it - and cross fingers there's not many
> > places to fix.
> 
> I prefer the above. Maybe even add a WARN_ON(in_softirq()) in 
> disable_irq.
> 
> But I must admit, I wouldn't know how to make that change without 
> spending more time on it then I have for this.

the simplest fix for now would be to use the _nosync variant in the 
vortex timeout function.

Mark, does this fix the problem?

	Ingo

Index: linux-rt.q/drivers/net/3c59x.c
===================================================================
--- linux-rt.q.orig/drivers/net/3c59x.c
+++ linux-rt.q/drivers/net/3c59x.c
@@ -1897,7 +1897,8 @@ vortex_timer(unsigned long data)
 
 	if (vp->medialock)
 		goto leave_media_alone;
-	disable_irq(dev->irq);
+	/* hack! */
+	disable_irq_nosync(dev->irq);
 	old_window = ioread16(ioaddr + EL3_CMD) >> 13;
 	EL3WINDOW(4);
 	media_status = ioread16(ioaddr + Wn4_Media);

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-12 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-12  2:43 [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process? john stultz
2006-05-12  5:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12  7:59   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12  8:10     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12 11:39     ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 11:56       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-05-12 11:59         ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 12:53         ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 13:03           ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12 13:06             ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 13:19             ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 17:47   ` john stultz
2006-05-12 18:04   ` john stultz
2006-05-12 19:16     ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 20:04     ` Mark Hounschell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-12  4:22 Edward Killips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060512115614.GA28377@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markh@compro.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox