From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Erik Mouw <erik@harddisk-recovery.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@gmail.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 23:48:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060512224804.GT27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060512222816.GS27946@ftp.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:28:16PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Ah, right - there was another uevent mess in fs/super.c. Sorry, got them
> confused... and that FPOS _is_ back.
Actually...
What happens is that turd in fs/super.c (one that should not have been
resurrected) triggers call of block_uevent(). Which uses ->driverfs_dev.
Which is a bug.
So IMO we should simply kill that animal _again_, and see if block_uevent()
is actually need for anything on its own.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-12 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060511151456.GD3755@harddisk-recovery.com>
[not found] ` <15ddcffd0605112153q57f139a1k7068e204a3eeaf1f@mail.gmail.com>
2006-05-12 17:16 ` [BUG 2.6.17-git] kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache scsi_cmd_cache Erik Mouw
2006-05-12 17:27 ` Andrew Vasquez
2006-05-12 20:18 ` Erik Mouw
2006-05-12 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 17:47 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-12 18:58 ` James Bottomley
2006-05-12 19:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 20:38 ` Russell King
2006-05-12 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 20:58 ` Russell King
2006-05-12 21:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 21:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 21:51 ` Russell King
2006-05-12 22:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 23:57 ` Greg KH
2006-05-14 16:01 ` Russell King
2006-05-12 21:18 ` Greg KH
2006-05-12 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 22:45 ` Greg KH
2006-05-12 20:52 ` Greg KH
2006-05-12 21:03 ` Russell King
2006-05-12 21:34 ` Greg KH
2006-05-12 21:39 ` Al Viro
2006-05-12 20:30 ` Erik Mouw
2006-05-12 20:37 ` Russell King
2006-05-12 20:21 ` Erik Mouw
2006-05-12 20:34 ` Russell King
2006-05-12 21:43 ` Al Viro
2006-05-12 21:55 ` Russell King
2006-05-12 22:08 ` Al Viro
2006-05-12 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 22:28 ` Al Viro
2006-05-12 22:48 ` Al Viro [this message]
2006-05-12 22:51 ` Al Viro
2006-05-12 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-12 23:21 ` Al Viro
2006-05-12 23:37 ` Al Viro
2006-05-12 23:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-13 0:20 ` Al Viro
2006-05-24 14:07 ` Erik Mouw
2006-05-13 0:08 ` Greg KH
2006-05-12 22:37 ` Russell King
2006-05-12 21:58 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060512224804.GT27946@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=erik@harddisk-recovery.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=or.gerlitz@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox