From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Segfault on the i386 enter instruction
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:32:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200605161132.18610.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605152231_MC3-1-BFDF-12B4@compuserve.com>
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 04:29, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <44676F42.7080907@aknet.ru>
>
> On Sun, 14 May 2006 21:56:18 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Handling it like you expect would require to disassemble
> > > the function in the page fault handler and it's probably not
> > > worth doing that for this weird case.
> > Just wondering, is this case really that weird?
> > In fact, the check against %esp that the kernel
> > does, looks strange. I realize that it can catch a
> > (very rare) user-space bug of accessing below %esp, but
> > other than that it looks redundant (IMHO) and as soon as
> > it triggers the false-positives, what is it really good for?
>
> I can't get a SIGSEGV on any native i386 kernel, not even when
> running on AMD64. It only happens on native x86_64 kernels.
I reproduced the original SIGSEGV on several i386 kernels.
> Intel says nothing about a write check. Is that a mistake in the manual
> or is that something only AMD64 does, and then only in long mode?
In 98+% of all cases when Intel and AMD documentation differ
in subtle detail it's a documentation bug.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-16 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-16 2:29 Segfault on the i386 enter instruction Chuck Ebbert
2006-05-16 9:32 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-17 8:20 Chuck Ebbert
2006-05-14 17:56 Stas Sergeev
2006-05-15 7:40 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-15 17:15 ` Stas Sergeev
2006-05-15 18:44 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-15 19:38 ` Stas Sergeev
2006-05-15 19:56 ` Lee Revell
2006-05-15 22:49 ` Ingo Oeser
2006-05-15 22:56 ` Lee Revell
2006-05-12 13:16 Tomasz Malesinski
2006-05-12 13:47 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-05-12 13:50 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-12 14:03 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-05-12 15:31 ` Tomasz Malesinski
2006-05-15 11:36 ` Bart Hartgers
2006-05-15 11:46 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-15 13:36 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-05-15 14:19 ` Bart Hartgers
2006-05-12 14:07 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-05-12 14:20 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-05-12 14:42 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-05-12 14:53 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-05-15 20:53 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200605161132.18610.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stsp@aknet.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox