From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751089AbWERBDg (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 21:03:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751174AbWERBDg (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 21:03:36 -0400 Received: from spooner.celestial.com ([192.136.111.35]:46505 "EHLO spooner.celestial.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751089AbWERBDf (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 21:03:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:03:35 -0400 From: Kurt Wall To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: http://advogato.org/article/888.html Message-ID: <20060518010335.GI5446@kurtwerks.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060513230206.GC12213@lkcl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060513230206.GC12213@lkcl.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.17-rc2krw X-Woot: Woot! Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 12:02:06AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton took 16 lines to write: > "Recently there has been a fuss over monolithic and micro kernels - > specifically the direction of the Linux Kernel development. Free > Software is about "freedom of choice", and we should be able to choose > to compile the Linux Kernel as either a monolith or a microkernel. " Good luck with that. Kurt -- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -- Arthur C. Clarke