public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: cel@netapp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] nfs: check all iov segments for correct memory access rights
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:22:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060519112231.5ed3d565.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060519180036.3244.70897.stgit@brahms.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net>

Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> +/*
> + * Check:
> + * 1.  All bytes in the user buffers are properly accessible
> + * 2.  The resulting number of bytes won't overflow ssize_t
> + */

hm.

> +static ssize_t check_access_ok(int type, const struct iovec *iov, unsigned long nr_segs)
> +{
> +	ssize_t count = 0;
> +	ssize_t retval = -EINVAL;
> +	unsigned long seg;
> +
> +	for (seg = 0; seg < nr_segs; seg++) {
> +		void __user *buf = iov[seg].iov_base;
> +		ssize_t len = (ssize_t) iov[seg].iov_len;
> +
> +		if (len < 0)		/* size_t not fitting an ssize_t .. */
> +			goto out;

do_readv_writev() already checked for negative iov_len, and that's the more
appropriate place to do it, rather than duplicating it in each filesystem
(or forgetting to!)

So is this check really needed?

> +		if (unlikely(!access_ok(type, buf, len))) {
> +			retval = -EFAULT;
> +			goto out;
> +		}

Now what's up here?  Why does NFS, at this level, care about the page's
virtual address?  get_user_pages() will handle that?


  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-19 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-19 17:56 [PATCH 0/6] Support scatter/gather I/O in NFS direct I/O path Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] nfs: "open code" the NFS direct write rescheduler Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:10   ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 18:37     ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:46       ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 18:56         ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfs: remove user_addr and user_count from nfs_direct_req Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] nfs: Eliminate nfs_get_user_pages() Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:17   ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 19:18     ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfs: alloc nfs_read/write_data as direct I/O is scheduled Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] nfs: check all iov segments for correct memory access rights Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:22   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-05-19 18:46     ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 19:36     ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 20:07       ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 18:25   ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-22 11:27   ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] nfs: Support vector I/O throughout the NFS direct I/O path Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060519112231.5ed3d565.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cel@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=cel@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox