From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: cel@netapp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] nfs: check all iov segments for correct memory access rights
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:22:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060519112231.5ed3d565.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060519180036.3244.70897.stgit@brahms.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net>
Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> +/*
> + * Check:
> + * 1. All bytes in the user buffers are properly accessible
> + * 2. The resulting number of bytes won't overflow ssize_t
> + */
hm.
> +static ssize_t check_access_ok(int type, const struct iovec *iov, unsigned long nr_segs)
> +{
> + ssize_t count = 0;
> + ssize_t retval = -EINVAL;
> + unsigned long seg;
> +
> + for (seg = 0; seg < nr_segs; seg++) {
> + void __user *buf = iov[seg].iov_base;
> + ssize_t len = (ssize_t) iov[seg].iov_len;
> +
> + if (len < 0) /* size_t not fitting an ssize_t .. */
> + goto out;
do_readv_writev() already checked for negative iov_len, and that's the more
appropriate place to do it, rather than duplicating it in each filesystem
(or forgetting to!)
So is this check really needed?
> + if (unlikely(!access_ok(type, buf, len))) {
> + retval = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
Now what's up here? Why does NFS, at this level, care about the page's
virtual address? get_user_pages() will handle that?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-19 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-19 17:56 [PATCH 0/6] Support scatter/gather I/O in NFS direct I/O path Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] nfs: "open code" the NFS direct write rescheduler Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 18:37 ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 18:56 ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfs: remove user_addr and user_count from nfs_direct_req Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] nfs: Eliminate nfs_get_user_pages() Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:17 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 19:18 ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfs: alloc nfs_read/write_data as direct I/O is scheduled Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] nfs: check all iov segments for correct memory access rights Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 18:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-05-19 18:46 ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 19:36 ` Chuck Lever
2006-05-19 20:07 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 18:25 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-22 11:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-19 18:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] nfs: Support vector I/O throughout the NFS direct I/O path Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060519112231.5ed3d565.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cel@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=cel@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox