From: Peter Lundkvist <p.lundkvist@telia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Page writeback broken after resume: wb_timer lost
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 08:52:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060521065248.GA5659@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060520171244.4399bc54.akpm@osdl.org>
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 05:12:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Peter, does this fix it?
>
Yes, it does fix the problem.
Hopefully we'll see this fix in the next stable update, because
of the risk of data loss.
>
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
>
> pdflush is carefully designed to ensure that all wakeups have some
> corresponding work to do - if a woken-up pdflush thread discovers that it
> hasn't been given any work to do then this is considered an error.
>
> That all broke when swsusp came along - because a timer-delivered wakeup to a
> frozen pdflush thread will just get lost. This causes the pdflush thread to
> get lost as well: the writeback timer is supposed to be re-armed by pdflush in
> process context, but pdflush doesn't execute the callout which does this.
>
> Fix that up by ignoring the return value from try_to_freeze(): jsut proceed,
> see if we have any work pending and only go back to sleep if that is not the
> case.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
> ---
>
> mm/pdflush.c | 9 ++-------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN mm/pdflush.c~pdflush-handle-resume-wakeups mm/pdflush.c
> --- devel/mm/pdflush.c~pdflush-handle-resume-wakeups 2006-05-20 17:02:21.000000000 -0700
> +++ devel-akpm/mm/pdflush.c 2006-05-20 17:11:25.000000000 -0700
> @@ -104,13 +104,8 @@ static int __pdflush(struct pdflush_work
> list_move(&my_work->list, &pdflush_list);
> my_work->when_i_went_to_sleep = jiffies;
> spin_unlock_irq(&pdflush_lock);
> -
> schedule();
> - if (try_to_freeze()) {
> - spin_lock_irq(&pdflush_lock);
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> + try_to_freeze();
> spin_lock_irq(&pdflush_lock);
> if (!list_empty(&my_work->list)) {
> printk("pdflush: bogus wakeup!\n");
> @@ -118,7 +113,7 @@ static int __pdflush(struct pdflush_work
> continue;
> }
> if (my_work->fn == NULL) {
> - printk("pdflush: NULL work function\n");
> + printk("pflush: resuming\n");
> continue;
> }
> spin_unlock_irq(&pdflush_lock);
> _
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-21 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-20 13:03 [PATCH] Page writeback broken after resume: wb_timer lost Peter Lundkvist
2006-05-20 17:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-20 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-05-21 0:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-21 6:52 ` Peter Lundkvist [this message]
2006-05-21 10:08 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-16 21:24 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-06-16 23:12 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-06-19 15:41 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-21 3:38 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-21 3:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21 4:10 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-21 4:19 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-22 20:25 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060521065248.GA5659@localhost \
--to=p.lundkvist@telia.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox