From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, dragoran <dragoran@feuerpokemon.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de
Subject: [2.6 patch] x86_64: don't printk for unimplemented 32bit syscalls
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 02:17:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060522001721.GF3339@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060521194704.GJ8250@redhat.com>
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 03:47:04PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 09:38:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 02:56:10PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually it is kinda throttled, but only on process name.
> > > This patch just removes that stuff completely.
> > > (Also removes a bunch of trailing whitespace)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > --- linux-2.6.16.noarch/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c~ 2006-05-21 14:50:57.000000000 -0400
> > > +++ linux-2.6.16.noarch/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2006-05-21 14:51:48.000000000 -0400
> > > @@ -522,17 +522,9 @@ sys32_waitpid(compat_pid_t pid, unsigned
> > > }
> > >
> > > int sys32_ni_syscall(int call)
> > > -{
> > > - struct task_struct *me = current;
> > > - static char lastcomm[sizeof(me->comm)];
> > > -
> > > - if (strncmp(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm))) {
> > > - printk(KERN_INFO "IA32 syscall %d from %s not implemented\n",
> > > - call, me->comm);
> > > - strncpy(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm));
> > > - }
> > > - return -ENOSYS;
> > > -}
> > > +{
> > > + return -ENOSYS;
> > > +}
> > >...
> >
> > Why can't we remove sys32_ni_syscall() and call sys_ni_syscall()
> > instead if all we want to do is to return -ENOSYS?
>
> We could, though it's a more invasive patch, which would probably sprinkle
> extra includes/externs over multiple files, for no practical gain
> over having this tiny function isolated to this file.
Where exactly is the problem with the patch below (only compile tested
due to lack of hardware)?
> Dave
cu
Adrian
<-- snip -->
Don't let users spam the logs by using unimplemented 32bit syscalls.
Simply use sys_ni_syscall().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
---
arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S | 2 +-
arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c | 13 -------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- linux-git-x86_64/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c.old 2006-05-22 02:10:15.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-git-x86_64/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2006-05-22 02:10:24.000000000 +0200
@@ -508,19 +508,6 @@
return compat_sys_wait4(pid, stat_addr, options, NULL);
}
-int sys32_ni_syscall(int call)
-{
- struct task_struct *me = current;
- static char lastcomm[sizeof(me->comm)];
-
- if (strncmp(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm))) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "IA32 syscall %d from %s not implemented\n",
- call, me->comm);
- strncpy(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm));
- }
- return -ENOSYS;
-}
-
/* 32-bit timeval and related flotsam. */
asmlinkage long
--- linux-git-x86_64/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S.old 2006-05-22 02:10:56.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-git-x86_64/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S 2006-05-22 02:11:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@
ni_syscall:
movq %rax,%rdi
- jmp sys32_ni_syscall
+ jmp sys_ni_syscall
quiet_ni_syscall:
movq $-ENOSYS,%rax
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-22 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-21 8:35 IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64 dragoran
2006-05-21 8:50 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-21 9:06 ` dragoran
2006-05-21 9:11 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-21 9:26 ` dragoran
2006-05-21 9:54 ` dragoran
2006-05-21 16:03 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 18:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-05-21 18:50 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 18:56 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 19:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-21 19:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-22 0:17 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-05-21 22:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-21 22:28 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 22:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-21 23:48 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-21 23:51 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-22 5:59 ` dragoran
2006-05-22 12:41 ` Dave Jones
2006-05-23 14:30 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-05-21 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-21 19:35 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-21 19:38 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060522001721.GF3339@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dragoran@feuerpokemon.de \
--cc=drepper@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox