From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932235AbWEWWte (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 18:49:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932267AbWEWWte (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 18:49:34 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:7849 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932235AbWEWWtd (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 18:49:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:47:18 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Ivan Kokshaysky Cc: Patrick Jefferson , gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: fix MMIO addressing collisions Message-ID: <20060523224718.GA31629@kroah.com> References: <4472FFDA.2040005@hp.com> <20060524020654.A19699@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060524020654.A19699@jurassic.park.msu.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:06:54AM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:28:10PM +0000, Patrick Jefferson wrote: > > Clearing PCI Command bits fixes machine halts observed during sizing > > seqences using MMIO cycles. Clearing the bits is suggested by an > > implementation note in the PCI spec. > > The patch is not acceptable. This was discussed back in 2002: > > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0212.2/index.html#978 I agree, it's not going to be accepted. Patrick, are you trying to solve the same thing that Grant was back in 2002? Why do you feel this patch is necessary? thanks, greg k-h