Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected

[Jon Mason <jdmason@us.ibm.com>]

On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:54:23AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 05:34, Jon Mason wrote:
> > swiotlb relies on the gart specific iommu_aperture variable to know if
> > we discovered a hardware IOMMU before swiotlb initialization.  Introduce
> > iommu_detected to do the same thing, but in a HW IOMMU neutral manner,
> > in preparation for adding the Calgary HW IOMMU.
> 
> I applied them all.

Fantastic!

> But I think you broke the aperture setup. iommu_setup really
> needs to be called early, otherwise aperture.c doesn't get
> the right parameters.  I undid that change.

I'll take a look at that, but I did boot test these patches on my
opteron system and didn't notice anything wrong.  Are the patches
available for me to look at on firstfloor?

> And please next time send against the latest tree. It required
> quite some tweaking to apply.

Sorry, I pulled a the latest mercurial tree this morning, but I guess
that one is stale (or became stale over the day).  

> -Andi