Re: uclinux 2.4.32 panic

Willy Tarreau
2006-05-26T04:41:42Z

On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:51:18PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Thanks Willy,
>
> I tracked down the problem it was in the receive_chars(). Whoever did
> this had an #if 0
> that removed the test of the flip buffer count exceeding the flip buffer
> size, so under
> stress the buffer would overflow and zero the pointer stored in
> driver_data field.

Fine. Once your code works OK after the various cleanups, be sure to
send the patches back to the uclinux maintainers (including the fixes
for the rs_write() code we talked about in the first mail).

> Steve

Regards,
Willy