From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] request_firmware without a device
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:55:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060525145546.GB1129@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1148552781.4734.13.camel@localhost>
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 12:26:21PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Shaohua,
>
> > > > The patch allows calling request_firmware without a 'struct device'.
> > > > It appears we just need a name here from 'struct device'. I changed it
> > > > to use a kobject as Patrick suggested.
> > > > Next patch will use the new API to request firmware (microcode) for a CPU.
> > >
> > > But a cpu does have a struct device. Why not just use that?
> > It's a sysdev, no 'struct device' in it, IIRC.
>
> do we really need to differentiate between sysdev and device anymore. I
> recall a plan to unify all devices, but I might be wrong.
I don't think we need to keep them different anymore, they should be
made the same. Then issues like this will not happen.
And it will make your driver code smaller :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-25 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-25 3:50 [PATCH 1/2] request_firmware without a device Shaohua Li
2006-05-25 4:01 ` Greg KH
2006-05-25 4:49 ` Shaohua Li
2006-05-25 10:26 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-05-25 14:55 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-05-25 10:24 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-05-26 3:40 ` Shaohua Li
2006-05-26 4:06 ` Greg KH
2006-05-26 4:41 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060525145546.GB1129@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mochel@digitalimplant.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox