From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: don't consider regparm EXPERIMENTAL anymore
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:03:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060529190306.GD3955@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060520025353.GE9486@taniwha.stupidest.org>
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 07:53:53PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> [This might be a tad premature given recent tail-call fixups?]
>
> ---
>
> Drop EXPERIMENTAL status from REGPARM as a lot of people seem to use
> it and it seems to be pretty stable these days.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
>
> diff --git a/arch/i386/Kconfig b/arch/i386/Kconfig
> index 5b1a7d4..2b8657d 100644
> --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig
> @@ -660,8 +660,7 @@ config BOOT_IOREMAP
> default y
>
> config REGPARM
> - bool "Use register arguments (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> - depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> + bool "Use register arguments"
> default n
> help
> Compile the kernel with -mregparm=3. This uses a different ABI
You should make such patches against -mm (or at least against a current
Linus' tree).
The dependency on EXPERIMENTAL was removed more than two months ago in
Linus' tree (and at the same time the default was changed to "y").
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-29 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-20 2:53 [PATCH] i386: don't consider regparm EXPERIMENTAL anymore Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-20 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-05-20 20:13 ` [PATCH] i386: kill CONFIG_REGPARM completely Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-20 21:07 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-20 21:20 ` [RFC PATCH (take #2)] " Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-20 22:00 ` Matheus Izvekov
2006-05-20 23:24 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-05-22 11:47 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-05-23 7:55 ` Helge Hafting
2006-05-24 20:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-29 19:03 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060529190306.GD3955@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox