From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030266AbWFAUGL (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:06:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030265AbWFAUGL (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:06:11 -0400 Received: from gw.openss7.com ([142.179.199.224]:37044 "EHLO gw.openss7.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030263AbWFAUGJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:06:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:06:07 -0600 From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" To: Bob Picco Cc: hpa@zytor.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] klibc Message-ID: <20060601140607.A1688@openss7.org> Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.org Mail-Followup-To: Bob Picco , hpa@zytor.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060601194751.GD17809@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20060601194751.GD17809@localhost>; from bob.picco@hp.com on Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:47:51PM -0400 Organization: http://www.openss7.org/ Dsn-Notification-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Bob Picco wrote: > > -#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) > +#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) && \ > + !defined(__powerpc64__) Why not just !defined(__LP64__) ?