From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751284AbWFBMUV (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:20:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751286AbWFBMUV (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:20:21 -0400 Received: from dtp.xs4all.nl ([80.126.206.180]:62024 "HELO abra2.bitwizard.nl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751284AbWFBMUT (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:20:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:20:17 +0200 From: Erik Mouw To: "Abu M. Muttalib" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, k.oliver@t-online.de, jes@sgi.com Subject: Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (Jes Sorensen) Message-ID: <20060602122016.GC2051@harddisk-recovery.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Harddisk-recovery.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 05:44:38PM +0530, Abu M. Muttalib wrote: > I was running one application on a linux-2.4.19-rmk7-pxa1 box with 16 MB RAM > and 16 MB flash. It was all working fine. > > I am now trying to run the same application on a linux-2.6.13 box and > intermittently I get OOM-KILLER and killing of a required process. What has > changed between these two kernel version? Most of the VM subsystem, why do you ask...? Try to recreate the problem with a more recent 2.6 kernel and post a the kernel messages. Erik -- +-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 -- | Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands