From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltt-dev@shafik.org
Subject: Interrupts disabled for too long in printk
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 07:19:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060603111934.GA14581@Krystal> (raw)
Hi,
I ran some experiments with my kernel tracer (LTTng : http://ltt.polymtl.ca)
that showed missing interrupts. I wrote a small paper to show how to use my
tracer to solve this kind of problem which I presented at the CE Linux Form
last April.
http://tree.celinuxforum.org/CelfPubWiki/ELC2006Presentations?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=celf2006-desnoyers.pdf
It shows that, when the serial console is activated, the following code disables
interrupts for up to 15ms. On a system configured with a 250HZ timer (each 4ms),
it means that 3 scheduler ticks are lost.
In the current git :
kernel/printk.c: release_console_sem()
for ( ; ; ) {
-----> spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);
wake_klogd |= log_start - log_end;
if (con_start == log_end)
break; /* Nothing to print */
_con_start = con_start;
_log_end = log_end;
con_start = log_end; /* Flush */
spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
call_console_drivers(_con_start, _log_end);
-----> local_irq_restore(flags);
}
I guess interrupts are disabled for a good reason (to protect this spinlock for
being taken by a nested interrupt handler. One way I am thinking to fix this
problem would be to do a spin try lock and fail if it is already taken.
Mathieu
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-03 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-03 11:19 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2006-06-03 21:43 ` Interrupts disabled for too long in printk Steven Rostedt
2006-06-08 1:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-06-08 1:37 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-08 2:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-06-08 2:35 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-08 10:24 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-06-08 14:38 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-08 15:17 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-06-08 15:45 ` Jon Smirl
2006-06-08 18:34 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060603111934.GA14581@Krystal \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@shafik.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox