linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	Linux Portal <linportal@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Declare explicit, hardware based lock ranking in serio
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 12:11:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606031211.42976.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1149336677.3109.34.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

On Saturday 03 June 2006 08:11, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 07:56 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Saturday 03 June 2006 04:50, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > 
> > > > So we're taking ps2->cmd_mutex and then we're recurring back into
> > > > ps2_command() and then taking ps2->serio->cmd_mutex.
> > > > 
> > > > I suspect that's all correct/natural/expected and needs another
> > > > make-lockdep-shut-up patch.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The PS/2 code has a natural device order and there is a one level
> > > recursion in this device order in terms of the cmd_mutex; annotate 
> > > this explicit recursion as ok
> > > 
> > 
> > It is not necessarily single depth - one could have 2 or more pass-through
> > ports chained together, although currently in kernel we only have Synaptics
> > pass-through. If we were ever to implement pass-through port for IBMs
> > trackpoints then we'd have:
> > 
> > 	Synaptics<->pass-through<->TP<->pass-through<->some mouse
> 
> is there a bound to this? lockdep can deal with upto 8 or so
> recursions....
> 
 
Theoretically - no, practically - 2 as shown above. At the moment the
only devices that are using/may be using pass-through ports are Synaptics
touchpad and IBM trackpoint.

-- 
Dmitry

      reply	other threads:[~2006-06-03 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-02 16:53 Kernel lock bug detected (kseriod) Linux Portal
2006-06-02 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-03  1:52   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-06-03  8:50   ` [patch] Declare explicit, hardware based lock ranking in serio Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-03 11:56     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-06-03 12:11       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-03 16:11         ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200606031211.42976.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --to=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linportal@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).