public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"'Nick Piggin'" <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	"'Chris Mason'" <mason@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix smt nice lock contention and optimization
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 18:17:25 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606031817.26018.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000801c686e5$666e5f60$df34030a@amr.corp.intel.com>

On Saturday 03 June 2006 18:12, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote on Saturday, June 03, 2006 12:58 AM
>
> > * Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> > > Could we make this neater with extra braces such as:
> > >
> > >  	for_each_domain(this_cpu, tmp) {
> > > 		if (tmp->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) {
> > >  			sd = tmp;
> > > 			break;
> > > 		}
> > > 	}
> > >
> > > and same for the other uses of for_each ? I know it's redundant but
> > > it's neater IMO when there are multiple lines of code below it.
> >
> > yep, that's the preferred style when there are multiple lines below a
> > loop.
>
> OK, thanks for the tips.  Here is an incremental coding-style fix:

Great!

Thanks Chris, Nick and Ken for your input.

Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
for both

-- 
-ck

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-03  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-03  7:43 [patch] fix smt nice lock contention and optimization Chen, Kenneth W
2006-06-03  7:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-03  8:11   ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-03  8:17     ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-06-03  8:22       ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-03  7:52 ` Con Kolivas
2006-06-03  7:57   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-03  8:12     ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-06-03  8:17       ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2006-06-03  8:52 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-03 18:45 ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200606031817.26018.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox