From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751189AbWFEPkc (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:40:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751192AbWFEPkc (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:40:32 -0400 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:2238 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751189AbWFEPkc (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:40:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:40:17 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Blaisorblade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/8] UML - Define jmpbuf access constants Message-ID: <20060605154017.GA24405@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200602070223.k172NpJa009654@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060208164301.GC5240@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200606042020.00120.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200606042020.00120.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:19:59PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > What about #ifdef'ing out the offending code #ifndef one of these constants > (they'll be defined or not altogether). As expectable, this wasn't yet > implemented - let's give the right priority to things. > (I've just met this on my SuSE, btw, which prompted me to write this email). I think hpa just came to our rescue. There's a setjmp/longjmp implementation in klibc. If we pull that in and use it, we don't need our own copy. Jeff