From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751245AbWFERwc (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:52:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751246AbWFERwb (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:52:31 -0400 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:7585 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751245AbWFERwb (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:52:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:52:29 -0400 To: Martin Hierling Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.16.18 with general protection fault, perhaps nfsd Message-ID: <20060605175229.GL16064@fieldses.org> References: <20060531164707.GA19547@cc.fh-luh.de> <20060531204716.GL13682@fieldses.org> <20060601115313.GB4561@cc.fh-luh.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060601115313.GB4561@cc.fh-luh.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:53:13PM +0200, Martin Hierling wrote: > Hi Bruce, Hi List, > > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:47:16PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 06:47:07PM +0200, Martin Hierling wrote: > > > [4] Linux version 2.6.16.18-xen (root@defiant) > > > > Is there a xen patch applied as well? > > sure. 3.0.2-2 Well, this isn't a problem I can reproduce myself, and reading through the code I don't see how this could happen. So, grasping at straws a bit, the only thing I can think to suspect is the xen patch. I can't find any "3.0.2-2" patch anywhere, though; where can I find that code? --b.