From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750777AbWFGBKJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 21:10:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750767AbWFGBKI (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 21:10:08 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([143.182.124.22]:23867 "EHLO azsmga101.ch.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750783AbWFGBKH (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 21:10:07 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,215,1146466800"; d="scan'208"; a="47115490:sNHT1373080268" Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:06:22 -0700 From: "Siddha, Suresh B" To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Siddha, Suresh B" , nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, mingo@elte.hu, pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [Patch] sched: mc/smt power savings sched policy Message-ID: <20060606180622.B18026@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20060606112521.A18026@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <200606070959.09216.kernel@kolivas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200606070959.09216.kernel@kolivas.org>; from kernel@kolivas.org on Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:59:08AM +1000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:59:08AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > This MC code is a maze of #ifdefs within functions and getting harder to > follow with each subsequent patch. Can we not deviate so much from kernel > style? build_sched_domains() originally was not designed with this many sched domains in mind.. I can take a look at cleaning up of the sched domains setup.. thanks, suresh