From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751001AbWFFTeA (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:34:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751011AbWFFTeA (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:34:00 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:49055 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751001AbWFFTd7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:33:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 21:33:25 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@infradead.org Subject: Re: [patch, -rc5-mm3] lock validator: -V3 Message-ID: <20060606193325.GA16010@elte.hu> References: <20060606154530.GA11063@elte.hu> <20060606091515.27db4746.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060606091515.27db4746.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -3.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-3.1 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 17:45:30 +0200 > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > 30 files changed, 545 insertions(+), 230 deletions(-) > > This basically screws up the whole patch series. It'll create a > barrier over which it will be hard to move fixups against existing > patches. yes. Dont worry about it, i'll refactor the whole lock validator queue once i've done the cleanups too. > ho-hum. Let's make sure that future patches are extremely > fine-grained and please try to identify whether they're applicable to > -v2 or to -v3 and we'll see how it goes. there was just no other way to do this - this change is intrusive independently of how finegrained the patches are. Ingo