From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750904AbWFGIde (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 04:33:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750908AbWFGIde (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 04:33:34 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:47031 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750895AbWFGIdd (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 04:33:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:33:04 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: genirq: fasteoi change for retrigger Message-ID: <20060607083304.GA31202@elte.hu> References: <1149660616.27572.138.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1149660616.27572.138.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5568] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Hi Ingo, Thomas. > > Would you be ok with a small change to the fasteoi handler that > > - If the interrupt happens while disabled, rather than just doing goto > out, also mark it pending > - In the normal handling code path, clear pending. > > That would allow some sort of soft-disable to work with fasteoi. > > My issue here is on Cell. I have a very strange interrupt controller > that can't mask interrupts. sure, it looks reasonable to me. Thomas? Ingo