From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Brendan Trotter" <btrotter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NMI problems with Dell SMP Xeons
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:13:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606071413.00990.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6799.1149680860@ocs3.ocs.com.au>
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 13:47, Keith Owens wrote:
> Andi Kleen (on Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:01:40 +0200) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Two ways:
> >>
> >> (1) Boot with a kernel with CONFIG_ACPI=n, so the OS only finds 2 cpus
> >> in the MPT instead of the 4 listed by ACPI.
> >>
> >> (2) The kernel has ACPI=y, but is booted with maxcpus=2.
> >>
> >> In both cases, send_IPI_allbutself() with IPI 2 or an NMI will result
> >> in a hard reset.
> >
> >Sounds both like a "Don't do that when it hurts" . I know some people
> >have religious issues with ACPI, but it's simple a fact that many
> >modern boxes don't work correctly in obvious or subtle ways without it.
>
> Building a kernel without ACPI is silly nowadays. But even with ACPI,
> booting with a restricted maxcpus and sending IPI 2 or NMI as broadcast
> will kill these boxes. maxcpus is a valid option.
Yes, I'm not opposed to using *_sequence on cpu_online_map here. Please send a patch.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-07 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-22 9:08 NMI problems with Dell SMP Xeons Keith Owens
2006-05-22 23:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-23 1:26 ` Keith Owens
2006-05-23 1:55 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-23 2:02 ` Keith Owens
2006-05-23 2:21 ` Keith Owens
2006-05-23 5:03 ` Keith Owens
2006-06-07 4:49 ` Keith Owens
2006-06-07 7:20 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 7:43 ` Keith Owens
2006-06-07 8:01 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 11:47 ` Keith Owens
2006-06-07 12:13 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-06-07 15:18 ` Brendan Trotter
2006-06-07 15:23 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 18:47 ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-08 0:41 ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-08 0:46 ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-08 5:11 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606071413.00990.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=btrotter@gmail.com \
--cc=kaos@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox