public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	David Liontooth <liontooth@cogweb.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB devices fail unnecessarily on unpowered hubs
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 09:01:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060608070108.GD3688@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606060943.59072.oliver@neukum.org>

Hi!

> > > If that does the job we need to somehow inherit the power supply maximum from
> > > PCI when we allocate the root hub's device structure.
> > 
> > I don't think there is such a convention that's generic for PCI.  There might
> > be ACPI-specific tables holding that value, but on embedded hardware the model
> > is often that the arch/.../board-ZZZ.c file just "knows" things like how much
> > power the regulator powering that port can provide, and arranges bus_mA to match.
> > Just like it knows all sorts of other details about how that board works.
> 
> Yes, I am afraid it cannot be done on the fly. But we might use a symbolic
> define which a subarch can override instead of a literal "500".
> If it turns out that this problem is one of power and not some other
> deficiency of this system's root hub.

That's bad... because we don't know exact model until runtime (ARM
tries to support many machines with single binary kernel, AFAICS), and
this is very likely going to be model-dependend.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-08  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-01  9:18 USB devices fail unnecessarily on unpowered hubs David Liontooth
2006-05-30 20:01 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-03  9:29   ` Oliver Neukum
2006-06-05 14:32     ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2006-06-06  7:43       ` Oliver Neukum
2006-06-08  7:01         ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-06-08  8:34       ` [PATCH] limit power budget on spitz Pavel Machek
2006-06-08  8:50         ` Richard Purdie
2006-06-08  9:02           ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-08  9:22             ` Richard Purdie
2006-06-08 17:09               ` Russell King
2006-06-08 18:26                 ` David Brownell
2006-06-08 20:06                   ` Richard Purdie
2006-06-08 20:38                     ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2006-06-08 21:22                       ` Richard Purdie
2006-06-08 21:40                         ` David Brownell
2006-06-08 21:49                           ` Richard Purdie
2006-06-08 23:44                             ` David Brownell
2006-06-09  1:25                               ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-06-09  2:03                                 ` David Brownell
2006-06-09  2:34                                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-06-01 10:01 ` USB devices fail unnecessarily on unpowered hubs Andrew Morton
2006-06-01 11:42   ` Daniel Drake
2006-06-01 14:58   ` Alan Stern
2006-06-01 15:09     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-06-01 15:23       ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-06-01 21:39         ` Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
2006-06-01 15:53       ` Oliver Neukum
2006-06-01 17:24         ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-06-01 16:57       ` Alan Stern
2006-06-01 16:43     ` [linux-usb-devel] " Greg KH
2006-06-02  0:03       ` David Liontooth
2006-06-02  1:53         ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2006-06-02  7:12         ` Oliver Neukum
2006-06-02 15:11         ` Alan Stern
2006-06-02 19:49           ` David Liontooth
2006-06-01 16:59     ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-01 17:08       ` Alan Stern
2006-06-01 17:34   ` Mark Lord
2006-06-01 17:47     ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060608070108.GD3688@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=liontooth@cogweb.net \
    --cc=oliver@neukum.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox