From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932105AbWFHKUW (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 06:20:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932112AbWFHKUW (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 06:20:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:27026 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932105AbWFHKUW (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 06:20:22 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: bidulock@openss7.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] use unlikely() for current_kernel_time() loop Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:20:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Andrew Morton , adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060607173642.GA6378@schatzie.adilger.int> <200606081114.09390.ak@suse.de> <20060608033633.A16099@openss7.org> In-Reply-To: <20060608033633.A16099@openss7.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606081220.04060.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 08 June 2006 11:36, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Andi, > > On Thu, 08 Jun 2006, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > performance increased 2% per hyperthread; > > > > That would surprise me. Most likely you made some measurement error. > > > > Don't think there was an error. Tests performed on STREAMS external > modules optimized with profiling data. You mean with compiler profile feedback? If that is slower then it would sound like a compiler bug. -Andi