From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965272AbWFIUvJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:51:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965239AbWFIUvJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:51:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:182 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965253AbWFIUvH (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:51:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:50:36 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Theodore Tso , Jeff Garzik , Alex Tomas , Andrew Morton , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Message-ID: <20060609205036.GI7420@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Theodore Tso , Jeff Garzik , Alex Tomas , Andrew Morton , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger References: <20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <4489A7ED.8070007@garzik.org> <20060609195750.GD10524@thunk.org> <20060609203803.GF3574@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060609203803.GF3574@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:38:03PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > that the older code cannot read. Alex claims people just shouldn't use > "-o extents", but the fact is their distro will choose it for them. .. on partitions over a certain size, which couldn't be read with older ext3 filesystems _anyway_ Enabling it by default on partitions of a size less than those that need extents seems to be somewhat pointless to me? Am I missing something fundamental that precludes the use of both extent-based and current existing filesystems from the same code simultaneously ? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk