From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -rt] Priority preemption latency
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:36:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060611073609.GA12456@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606102324.58932.dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
* Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the updated patch! It wouldn't quite build (proc_misc.c still
> > referenced the old rt_overload_* variables, fixup patch attached removing
> > those print statements). I have it running on a 4 way opteron box running
> > prio-preempt in a timed while loop, exiting only on failure. It's been
> > running fine for several minutes - usually fails in under a mintue. We'll
> > see how it's doing in the morning :-)
>
> Well it failed in about 14 minutes. The machine was under heavy load
> running another benchmark. I have removed the secondary benchmark and
> am running prio-preempt alone on the same 4 way opteron box. Will
> post again when I know more...
ok - could you try the patch from today (re-attached below)? Maybe that
theoretical scenario i mentioned is only theoretical in theory ;-)
Ingo
Index: linux-rt.q/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-rt.q.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-rt.q/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1588,38 +1588,37 @@ out_set_cpu:
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
cpu = task_cpu(p);
- } else {
+ }
+ /*
+ * If a newly woken up RT task cannot preempt the
+ * current (RT) task (on a target runqueue) then try
+ * to find another CPU it can preempt:
+ */
+ if (rt_task(p) && !TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, rq)) {
+ this_rq = cpu_rq(this_cpu);
/*
- * If a newly woken up RT task cannot preempt the
- * current (RT) task (on a target runqueue) then try
- * to find another CPU it can preempt:
+ * Special-case: the task on this CPU can be
+ * preempted. In that case there's no need to
+ * trigger reschedules on other CPUs, we can
+ * mark the current task for reschedule.
+ *
+ * (Note that it's safe to access this_rq without
+ * extra locking in this particular case, because
+ * we are on the current CPU.)
*/
- if (rt_task(p) && !TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, rq)) {
- this_rq = cpu_rq(this_cpu);
+ if (TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, this_rq))
+ set_tsk_need_resched(this_rq->curr);
+ else
/*
- * Special-case: the task on this CPU can be
- * preempted. In that case there's no need to
- * trigger reschedules on other CPUs, we can
- * mark the current task for reschedule.
- *
- * (Note that it's safe to access this_rq without
- * extra locking in this particular case, because
- * we are on the current CPU.)
+ * Neither the intended target runqueue
+ * nor the current CPU can take this task.
+ * Trigger a reschedule on all other CPUs
+ * nevertheless, maybe one of them can take
+ * this task:
*/
- if (TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, this_rq))
- set_tsk_need_resched(this_rq->curr);
- else
- /*
- * Neither the intended target runqueue
- * nor the current CPU can take this task.
- * Trigger a reschedule on all other CPUs
- * nevertheless, maybe one of them can take
- * this task:
- */
- smp_send_reschedule_allbutself();
+ smp_send_reschedule_allbutself();
- schedstat_inc(this_rq, rto_wakeup);
- }
+ schedstat_inc(this_rq, rto_wakeup);
}
out_activate:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-11 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-10 0:01 [RFC PATCH -rt] Priority preemption latency Darren Hart
2006-06-10 6:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-10 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-11 5:49 ` Darren Hart
2006-06-11 5:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-11 6:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-11 6:24 ` Darren Hart
2006-06-11 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-06-12 15:38 ` Darren Hart
2006-06-15 21:06 ` Mike Kravetz
2006-06-15 22:13 ` Darren Hart
2006-06-15 23:05 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-15 22:48 ` Mike Kravetz
2006-07-11 16:48 ` Mike Kravetz
2006-06-12 20:12 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060611073609.GA12456@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox