From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:02:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060611130249.GA10606@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606102015410.30593@cuia.boston.redhat.com>
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:16:24PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 01:27 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> > > Now that there is even an RFC published about SPF...
> >
> > Please, don't do this. SPF makes assumptions about email which are just
> > not true; it rejects perfectly valid mail.
> >
> > http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html
>
> Think about it for a second. Do you *really* want those
> something@alumni.mit.edu people on lkml? :)
Actually, I post as "tytso@mit.edu" (but always relayed through my
mail relay at thunk.org). :-)
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-11 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-10 22:27 VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter) Matti Aarnio
2006-06-10 23:06 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-11 0:16 ` Rik van Riel
2006-06-11 0:44 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-11 13:02 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2006-06-11 13:55 ` Rik van Riel
2006-06-11 14:03 ` Avi Kivity
2006-06-12 8:47 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-12 10:17 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-12 10:35 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-12 11:07 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-11 2:24 ` marty fouts
2006-06-11 2:41 ` jdow
2006-06-11 2:58 ` David Schwartz
2006-06-11 5:17 ` jdow
2006-06-12 8:18 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-06-12 8:23 ` jdow
2006-06-12 8:31 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-06-12 9:47 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-12 10:30 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-12 10:33 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-12 17:37 ` Gerhard Mack
2006-06-12 18:14 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-06-12 18:46 ` jdow
2006-06-12 19:16 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-06-12 21:51 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-06-13 21:12 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-12 9:53 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-12 10:01 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-06-12 11:14 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-12 10:58 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-12 11:22 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-12 11:42 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-06-13 23:32 ` Scott Lockwood
2006-06-13 23:42 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-06-14 0:02 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-14 10:20 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-16 3:53 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-06-12 8:27 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-06-12 20:25 ` Horst von Brand
2006-06-12 21:10 ` Nick Warne
2006-06-12 22:06 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-06-12 22:12 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-06-12 23:03 ` jdow
2006-06-13 3:00 ` Horst von Brand
2006-06-13 5:54 ` jdow
2006-06-13 8:36 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-06-13 9:58 ` Marc Perkel
2006-06-13 13:28 ` Horst von Brand
2006-06-13 14:34 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-13 9:05 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-13 10:45 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-13 12:24 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-13 12:49 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-13 13:10 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-13 15:19 ` Marc Perkel
2006-06-13 15:57 ` Auke Kok
2006-06-13 19:54 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-13 20:31 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-06-13 20:48 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-15 17:05 ` Keith Owens
2006-06-15 23:14 ` Wakko Warner
2006-06-13 0:11 ` Phil Oester
2006-06-13 0:26 ` David Miller
2006-06-13 4:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-06-13 15:17 ` Joel Jaeggli
2006-06-12 21:43 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-06-13 3:05 ` Horst von Brand
2006-06-13 8:31 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-06-13 10:50 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-13 13:15 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-06-11 5:09 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-11 5:26 ` jdow
2006-06-11 6:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-06-11 16:02 ` Folkert van Heusden
2006-06-11 17:54 ` Lee Revell
2006-06-11 18:54 ` David Miller
2006-06-12 9:09 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-12 11:32 ` Nikita Danilov
2006-06-12 14:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-12 20:00 ` David Miller
2006-06-12 22:29 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-06-12 22:48 ` David Miller
2006-06-12 22:57 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-06-13 3:54 ` VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter) - Alternative Marc Perkel
2006-06-13 4:51 ` David Miller
2006-06-13 13:41 ` VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter) Athanasius
2006-06-11 17:31 ` Marc Perkel
2006-06-11 18:50 ` Florian Weimer
[not found] ` <20060611072223.GA16150@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-06-12 8:32 ` Matti Aarnio
2006-06-12 8:40 ` Russell King
2006-06-12 9:57 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-12 15:55 ` Russell King
2006-06-12 20:06 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2006-06-12 11:22 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-12 15:41 ` Simon Oosthoek
2006-06-12 22:55 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-13 17:41 ` Matti Aarnio
2006-06-12 9:05 ` Matthias Andree
2006-06-12 17:28 ` Matthew Frost
2006-06-13 0:12 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060611130249.GA10606@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox