From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751251AbWFKNDQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:03:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751268AbWFKNDQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:03:16 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:38034 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751251AbWFKNDQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:03:16 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:02:49 -0400 From: Theodore Tso To: Rik van Riel Cc: David Woodhouse , Matti Aarnio , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter) Message-ID: <20060611130249.GA10606@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , Rik van Riel , David Woodhouse , Matti Aarnio , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060610222734.GZ27502@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <1149980791.18635.197.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:16:24PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 01:27 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: > > > Now that there is even an RFC published about SPF... > > > > Please, don't do this. SPF makes assumptions about email which are just > > not true; it rejects perfectly valid mail. > > > > http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html > > Think about it for a second. Do you *really* want those > something@alumni.mit.edu people on lkml? :) Actually, I post as "tytso@mit.edu" (but always relayed through my mail relay at thunk.org). :-) - Ted