Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter)

David Woodhouse
2006-06-13T00:12:43Z

On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 11:05 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> I believe checking Received: headers of backscatter (that term is used
> in Postfix discussions for "back falling junk") catches a fair amount
> of that junk.

Backscatter is trivial to deal with by other means -- like BATV.

Presumably we'd never accept bounces to the list addresses _anyway_,
since the lists never send mail from their canonical address.

--
dwmw2