From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751207AbWFLCaT (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:30:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751221AbWFLCaT (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:30:19 -0400 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]:55195 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751207AbWFLCaR (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:30:17 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:29:58 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: sam@ravnborg.org, akpm@osdl.org, jamagallon@ono.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ignore smp_locks section warnings from init/exit code Message-ID: <20060612022958.GA24148@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20060607104724.c5d3d730.akpm@osdl.org> <20060608003153.36f59e6a@werewolf.auna.net> <20060607154054.cf4f2512.akpm@osdl.org> <20060607162326.3d2cc76b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20060608021149.GA5567@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060608183549.GB18815@mars.ravnborg.org> <20060611232558.GB20639@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060611171740.b7f8e0fc.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060611171740.b7f8e0fc.rdunlap@xenotime.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:17:40PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > gdb tells me: > > (gdb) x/4xa 0x6027b748 > > 0x6027b748 : 0x0 0x0 > > 0x6027b758 : 0x0 0x0 > > > > So, with stdout@@GLIBC_2.2.5 at 0x6027b748 and completed.6111 at > > 0x6027b750 - right next to each other - there would seem to be nothing > > between them to reference anything. > > gdb says 0x6027b758 for , not 0x6027b750 as you > wrote, so there's 8 more bytes for gunk there. ;) > Anyway, since I can't build UML, I'm willing to look at the gdb says 0x6027b758 for , making completed.6111 = 0x6027b750, leaving 0 bytes for gunk. Jeff